Self-Reflection Memo of LRA
To: Ms. Crystal Rodwell
From: Kowshik Barua
Date: 10/22
Dear Ms. Crystal Rodwell,
I wanted to share my reflections on the analysis of lab reports, specifically focusing on the
rhetorical strategies employed by authors and the similarities and differences in the formats of
these reports. This analysis allowed me to gain a deeper understanding of how scientific
communication works, and I believe it has improved my ability to critically evaluate and write
lab reports.
One key takeaway from this analysis is the significance of rhetorical strategies in scientific
writing. I have come to realize that the choice of strategies such as objectivity, evidence, and
logic plays a crucial role in conveying the findings and conclusions effectively. For instance, the
use of objectivity helps maintain the credibility of the author and allows readers to assess the
experiment’s validity without bias. Similarly, employing evidence from the experiment’s results
and logical reasoning aids in presenting a clear and convincing argument, enhancing the overall
quality of the lab report. As I continue to develop my writing skills for engineering, I intend to
incorporate these strategies into my own reports to make them more effective and persuasive.
Furthermore, the analysis highlighted the importance of tailoring the style and language of a lab
report to the specific audience. Different fields and disciplines have their own jargon and
conventions, and adapting the report’s content and tone to the expectations of the target audience
is essential. I will keep this in mind when working on future lab reports to ensure that they are
both technically accurate and accessible to their intended readers.
Regarding the similarities and differences in lab report formats, I now understand that adhering
to a standard format is essential for clarity and ease of comparison. However, the minor
variations in format between the reports, such as the inclusion of a literature review section or
the placement of references, can be attributed to the specific requirements of the journals in
which they are published. This insight has made me more aware of the importance of closely
following submission guidelines when submitting my own work for publication.
In conclusion, this analysis has been an enlightening experience that has enriched my
understanding of lab report writing. I plan to apply the knowledge gained from this analysis to
improve my future lab reports, ensuring that they are not only well-structured but also effectively
communicate the findings and conclusions of the experiments. Thank you for providing the
opportunity to engage in this analysis and for your guidance throughout the course.
Sincerely,
Kowshik Barua
This entry is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
